🔗 Share this article BBC Departures Described as Inside 'Takeover' by Former Media Executive The recent resignations of the British Broadcasting Corporation's chief executive and its news chief over claims of bias have been characterized as an internal "takeover" by a former media executive. David Yelland, who previously ran the Sun publication from 1998 to 2003, stated during a broadcast that the exits of Tim Davie and Deborah Turness followed systematic undermining by people associated with the BBC board over an extended period. "It constituted a coup, and worse than that, it was an internal operation. There were people inside the corporation, very close to the board ... serving on the board, who have systematically undermined Tim Davie and his senior team over a duration of [time] and this has been continuing for a considerable period. What transpired yesterday didn't just happen in isolation," Yelland commented. Governance Breakdown Identified "What has occurred here is there was a failure of leadership. I don't hold responsible the chairman [Samir Shah] as an person, but the role of the leader of any institution, a company – encompassing the BBC – is to keep their CEO, their senior executive, in position or dismiss them. And that has not occurred, because Tim Davie hadn't been fired. He resigned and so there was, that represents the essence of, a breakdown of leadership." Context of Recent Dispute The departures on Sunday followed days of attacks from the White House and rightwing commentators in the UK that were prompted by claims reported by the Daily Telegraph. The publication reported a leaked record of the findings of a previous outside consultant to its content standards panel, Michael Prescott, who departed his position during the warmer months. He had criticized the modification of a speech by Donald Trump in an episode of Panorama, which he asserted made it appear that Trump had encouraged the US Capitol incident. Two sections of the address that were spliced together were spoken an hour apart, and the edit failed to mention that Trump had also stated he wanted his followers to demonstrate non-violently. Internal Reactions and Outside Perspectives Yelland's comments echo a sentiment of dismay described by insiders within BBC News on Sunday evening, with one stating: "It feels like a coup. This is the outcome of a effort by political opponents of the BBC." Others, encompassing Sky's former political editor Adam Boulton, have claimed the general perception that Trump egged on the event was fundamentally true. It is common practice to edit together sections of a long address to accurately condense it. Handover Arrangements and Institutional Impact Davie indicated his departure would not be instant and that he was "managing" timings to guarantee an "smooth handover" over the following months. Turness stated dispute around the Panorama edit had "reached a point where it is causing harm to the BBC – an institution that I love." On Monday, the BBC reporter Nick Robinson revealed there had been paralysis at the top of the BBC because, while its experienced reporters wanted to apologize for the production mistake – but maintain there was "no plan to deceive" the viewers – the government-selected directors wanted to go further. Political Reaction and Wider Context Shah is anticipated to express regret on Monday to the Parliament's culture, media and sport committee, and to provide further information on the Panorama program in his response to the panel, which had requested how he would address the concerns. Speaking after the departures, the government minister Louise Sandher-Jones dismissed claims the BBC was institutionally partial. The public service official told Sky News: "When you look at the huge spectrum of domestic issues, local concerns, global affairs, that it has to cover, I think its content is very respected. When I speak to individuals who've got firmly established opinions on those, they're still utilizing the BBC for much of their information, it's shaping their perspectives on this."