🔗 Share this article

As a Dungeon Master, I traditionally steered clear of heavy use of chance during my tabletop roleplaying sessions. My preference was for the plot and session development to be shaped by deliberate decisions as opposed to the roll of a die. However, I chose to try something different, and I'm incredibly pleased with the outcome.

The Inspiration: Observing an Improvised Tool

A popular actual-play show utilizes a DM who frequently calls for "fate rolls" from the players. This involves picking a type of die and assigning potential outcomes contingent on the number. While it's fundamentally no distinct from using a pre-generated chart, these are devised in the moment when a course of events doesn't have a obvious conclusion.

I chose to experiment with this approach at my own session, mostly because it looked engaging and presented a departure from my usual habits. The experience were fantastic, prompting me to think deeply about the ongoing tension between planning and spontaneity in a D&D campaign.

An Emotional In-Game Example

During one session, my players had concluded a massive fight. Later, a cleric character wondered if two beloved NPCs—a sibling duo—had lived. Rather than choosing an outcome, I asked for a roll. I instructed the player to make a twenty-sided die roll. I defined the outcomes as: on a 1-4, both died; on a 5-9, only one would die; on a 10+, they made it.

The player rolled a 4. This led to a profoundly moving moment where the characters found the corpses of their companions, forever clasped together in their final moments. The party conducted last rites, which was particularly significant due to previous roleplaying. As a parting reward, I decided that the NPCs' bodies were suddenly restored, containing a enchanted item. I randomized, the bead's magical effect was perfectly what the group needed to address another major quest obstacle. One just script such magical moments.

Improving On-the-Spot Skills

This incident led me to ponder if chance and spontaneity are in fact the beating heart of this game. While you are a prep-heavy DM, your skill to pivot may atrophy. Groups often take delight in ignoring the most carefully laid narratives. Therefore, a effective DM has to be able to adapt swiftly and invent content in real-time.

Using on-the-spot randomization is a great way to practice these abilities without straying too much outside your comfort zone. The key is to deploy them for low-stakes circumstances that have a limited impact on the campaign's main plot. To illustrate, I wouldn't use it to determine if the king's advisor is a secret enemy. However, I would consider using it to decide whether the party arrive just in time to see a major incident occurs.

Empowering Collaborative Storytelling

Luck rolls also serves to keep players engaged and create the impression that the adventure is dynamic, progressing based on their decisions immediately. It combats the perception that they are merely pawns in a DM's sole story, thereby strengthening the shared foundation of roleplaying.

Randomization has long been part of the original design. Early editions were enamored with charts, which suited a playstyle focused on treasure hunting. While current D&D tends to emphasizes story and character, leading many DMs to feel they require detailed plans, it's not necessarily the required method.

Striking the Healthy Equilibrium

There is absolutely no issue with doing your prep. Yet, it's also fine no problem with letting go and permitting the rolls to guide minor details instead of you. Control is a big part of a DM's job. We use it to run the game, yet we often struggle to release it, in situations where doing so can lead to great moments.

The core recommendation is this: Have no fear of letting go of control. Try a little randomness for inconsequential details. The result could find that the surprising result is infinitely more powerful than anything you would have scripted in advance.